Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) Business Law Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the FBLA Business Law Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Practice this question and more.


What does the doctrine of respondeat superior state?

  1. Employees cannot be held liable for their actions

  2. Employers are liable for employee actions taken within the scope of employment

  3. Independent contractors are responsible for their own actions

  4. Employers cannot be sued for employee misconduct

The correct answer is: Employers are liable for employee actions taken within the scope of employment

The doctrine of respondeat superior establishes a legal principle where employers are held liable for the conduct of their employees if those actions occur within the scope of employment. This means that if an employee engages in activities related to their job duties and causes harm to a third party, the employer can be held responsible for those actions. This doctrine promotes accountability in the workplace, ensuring that employers are incentivized to maintain proper supervision and training of their employees. In this context, the idea is that while employees perform tasks for the benefit of their employer, the employer bears the risk associated with those actions. This legal framework is essential in cases where employees might accidentally cause harm or make decisions that impact others while fulfilling job responsibilities. The other statements present different concepts that do not align with the doctrine. For example, the idea that employees cannot be held liable for their actions is inaccurate; employees can still be held personally responsible for their negligent or wrongful behavior in some situations. Similarly, suggesting that independent contractors are responsible for their own actions does not relate to the employer-employee relationship under respondeat superior, as it typically only applies to employees. Lastly, saying that employers cannot be sued for employee misconduct contradicts the core principle of respondeat superior, which explicitly allows for employer liability